In the past two decades, speed bumps have relentlessly spread all around the world.  The correlation between lower speed and reduced accidents is well established now so the appeal of speed bumps to road planners is obvious.

The word bump spelled out on the street before a speed bump, which is also know as a sleeping policeman, kipping cop, road hump, speed hump, speed breaker, or ramp.
Bump in the road

Well-designed speed bumps do deliver slower traffic which promises less accidents and less severe accidents.  And, as the majority of traffic accidents happen in towns and suburb that’s where speed bumps have most blossomed.

No one would claim speed bumps are perfect though and they get their fair share of criticism – mainly for causing noise and diverting problems to other streets.  They attempt to force drivers to drive better, as opposed to coaching or encouraging drivers to do so.

Pros and cons of speed bumps
Pros and cons of speed bumps

Anything to do with improving driver behaviour gets us interested at GOFAR of course, and so we ran a series of tests on speed bumps and noticed another impact that’s not been widely noted before, surprisingly.


Speed bumps cause more fuel to be burned.  Much more!

A typical driving style over speed bumps is to slow down for the bump, and then accelerate back up to the speed limit after.  Some drivers can even be observed going a little over the limit, to “catch up”.  Not that safe!

In general, the most efficient driving style is a smooth one, driving, in

Going over speed bumps carefully
Going over speed bumps carefully

an alert fashion, at a consistent speed at or just below the speed limit.  With this style we use just enough fuel and no more and we stay alert to potential dangers.


We try to be ready to brake when needed but minimise the need to do so by watching ahead for hazards and keeping a safe distance so we can react.

On speed bumps, drivers are “forced” to be safe which achieves one goal but hurts the efficiency and environment goal – because when we brake our forward momentum turns into heat, and then to regain our previous speed we need to use more gas.  A series of speed bumps therefore causes a stop start style that is very inefficient and creates extra emissions because fuel is burned that did not need to be burned when the road was flat.

How bad is it?  We were surprised.



GOFAR’s speed bump experiment – emissions increased by 60%

We drove over 8 roads, half of which had speed bumps.  We used the same car (a 1.4l, 2005 Mazda 3).  All the roads were flat and had the same speed limit.  The roads with speed bumps had 4 speed bumps.  Here’s what happened to fuel burn and emissions.


Fuel burned on 8 trips with and without speed bumps
Fuel burned on 8 trips with and without speed bumps

When you add up the trips with and without speed bumps then you can see that fuel use goes up 60.5% in this GOFAR test.

GOFAR find speed bumps increased fuel use by 60%
GOFAR find speed bumps increased fuel use by 60%


UK motoring organisation, the AA, found similar results in their track tests with the addition of speed bumps increasing fuel consumption by 46.9%.  For those who like imperial measures they showed that speed bumps almost halved mpg from 58mpg to 31 mpg in an average car.


So what’s the alternative?  How about flat speed bumps and responsible drivers!

No one wants drivers speeding through neighbourhoods.  But we all need to be greener too and lower speed and speed bumps increase emissions.  It’s tough for council road planners as they need to know how do we marry safety and the environment?

Well – at GOFAR we have our views on driver safety and improving driver behaviour, and so we were interested to see a way forward recently being tested in London.  The solution being tested is speed bumps that are actually a trick of the eye as they’re really flat, but they are painted to look like normal speed bumps.

We’re very interested to see how they work out.  They’ll allow well-trained emergency vehicle drivers to get where they need unhindered, and they’ll solve the noise problem of speed bumps and the wasted fuel burn that they currently cause.

Of course, it depends on the driver reaction too.  We find that drivers use GOFAR’s real time feedback as a conscience and a reminder to prompt them to a happier, cheaper, greener driving style.  We think once local drivers realise these speed bumps are not real they may still act in a similar way – but rather than forcing drivers to drive better, they will encourage drivers to do so with clear environmental benefits.

Interested in doing this test yourself?

Whilst our tests were consistent with those of the AA, we only did 8 test drives and it’s probable that driving over different speed bumps in different conditions will have different results.  If you want to replicate our test here’s what you need to do:

  1. Buy a GOFAR unit if you do not already have one.  It conveniently logs all your driving to your smart phone.
  2. Find a flat stretch with speed bumps and drive over it.  At the end, tag your trip as “Bump”.  Repeat a few times ideally.
  3. Find a flat stretch of similarish distance and drive over it.  At the end, tag your trip as “NoBump”.
  4. Make sure the speed limit is the same in both areas and drive safe and don’t exceed the limit.
  5. We’ll look for these tagged trips in our database of driving experiments and report on it online as more drivers add their data and the experiment becomes more accurate.

We want GOFAR to become the world’s biggest driving experiment so if you have something you’d like us to test, then just email with a suggestion and we’ll get on it!


Drive happy!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>